AIVO Win RateWhen AI makes the choice, does it choose you?
Example Full Test report

This is what a Full Test tells you

A real test, run on 28 September 2026: AI shopping agents on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity worked through the same customer request 15 times. The business's name and website are hidden; everything else, including the competitors AI chose instead, is exactly as recorded.

Your AI shopping result · 15 runs · 3 assistants · 1 customer brief
1 of 15

AI picked A London seafood restaurant outright in 1 of 15 shopping runs.

You were found in 14 of 15 runs but lost most of them before the pick. J. Sheekey won 4 runs, more than you.

Found
14 / 15
Shortlisted
3 / 15
Picked outright
1 / 15
Win Rate range
1.5–25.1%
Confidence
Moderate: 5 runs per combination. Treat the rates as direction, not precision. 10+ runs gives firmer figures.
00 · Can AI agents reach you?

Agent access check

What a legitimate AI shopping agent could and couldn't read during this test. Blocks are recorded, never worked around.

Your pageVisitsStatus
A London seafood restaurant1 Readable
A London seafood restaurant1 Readable

Other sites that turned the agents away (they then relied on other sources): thefork.co.uk (4), opentable.co.uk (4), opentable.com (2).

01 · The journey

Where you dropped out

Every run passes through the same stages. This is how many of the 15 reached each one with you still in it.

Foundagent came across you
93%
14 / 15
▼ lost 11 here · biggest drop
Shortlistedmade the agent's list
20%
3 / 15
Comparedin the final head-to-head
20%
3 / 15
▼ lost 2 here
Pickedthe agent's recommendation
1 / 15
02 · Every outcome

How all 15 runs ended

Not every run ends in one winner. We count every outcome.

1
14
Picked you1
Picked a competitor14
Picked nobody0
Stopped without deciding0
Didn't finish0
03 · Who beat you

Who AI chose instead

The 14 runs a competitor won outright.

J. Sheekey
4
Applebee's
3
Behind
3
Baccalà
2
Applebee's Fish
1
Bentley's Oyster Bar & Grill
1

Named as the place or brand the agent chose; a park's operator or a listing site is folded into the place itself.

04 · By assistant

Each AI behaves differently

AssistantFoundPickedWinner most often
ChatGPT5 / 50Behind
Gemini5 / 51J. Sheekey
Perplexity4 / 50Applebee's
05 · By customer

Where AI thinks you fit

Customer briefFoundPicked
Brief 114 / 151

Brief 1: “Looking for a good fish restaurant in London for 6 people on a Saturday might with a budget of up to GBP 150 per head”

06 · Why you lost

What the agents looked for and couldn't find

Taken from what the agents actually did: the pages they opened, what they searched for, and what they couldn't confirm. Observed means it happened in the recorded runs. Our read is our interpretation.

1 · ChatGPT and Perplexity always picked rivals with clearer facts
ObservedIn every ChatGPT and Perplexity run, the final pick was a rival (Behind, Applebee's, Baccalà, Bentley's) chosen because it had explicit, verifiable Saturday hours, six-person booking policy, and per-person pricing. A London seafood restaurant is never named as the runner-up reasoning in these excerpts.
Evidence: 8 rival picks · Facts
FixPublish a clear Saturday booking page for six, with set menu or a la carte price-per-head, so agents can verify budget fit directly. · web team
2 · Discovery is not the problem; verification is
Our readA London seafood restaurant was found in nearly all runs (ChatGPT 5/5, Perplexity 4/5, Gemini 5/5), so agents do see it. The gap is at shortlisting and picking, where rivals had explicit facts (price, hours, group booking) A London seafood restaurant pages did not clearly surface here.
Evidence: 2 rival picks, 1 run that picked you · Facts
FixAdd structured, explicit Saturday dinner details (hours, six-person booking, price range) to key pages so agents can confirm fit without inferring. · web team
3 · Gemini often shortlists A London seafood restaurant but fears budget overrun
ObservedGemini repeatedly considered A London seafood restaurant a top London seafood option but twice ruled it out in favour of J. Sheekey, warning that wine and service could push A London seafood restaurant past the £150 per head ceiling. This shows the business is competitive but seen as price-risky versus rivals.
Evidence: 2 rival picks · Competition
FixPublish transparent per-person cost examples (food, wine, service) so agents can confirm it stays within stated budgets. · content
4 · Gemini did pick A London seafood restaurant once with a generous budget framing
ObservedIn one run, Gemini picked A London seafood restaurant for a Saturday group dinner, praising its atmosphere and seafood menu as ideal for a big-budget night out. This shows the offer works when budget isn't framed as tight.
Evidence: 1 run that picked you · Competition
FixHighlight atmosphere and signature dishes prominently for higher-budget, special-occasion queries to reinforce this winning angle. · positioning

These are the decision points we saw in this test. Fixing them makes a win more likely but doesn't guarantee one. Rerun the same test afterwards to see what changed.

07 · The 1 run that never found you

What the agents searched for instead

Agent searchedTimes
“London fish seafood restaurants Saturday dinner six people menu prices”1
“site:thefork.co.uk London seafood restaurant Saturday dinner menu £ per person six”1
08 · Replay a run

ChatGPT · Brief 1 lost to Applebee's

01Search“best seafood restaurants London menus prices fish Saturday dinner”
02Search“London fish restaurant private group six dinner menu prices”
03Search“site:theoystermen.com London menu booking seafood restaurant”
04Openoystermen.co.uk/foodmenu
05Openapplebeesfish.com/
06Openthesavoylondon.com/events-and-celebrations/the-river-restaurant-privat
07OpenA London seafood restaurant-restaurant.com/private-dining/
08Search“site:applebeesfish.com "£" "Food menu"”
09Openapplebeesfish.com/s/AF_Food-menu_Template_March2.pdf
Want this for your business?
Your Win Rate, where you drop out, which competitors AI picks instead, and what to fix. Pay per test, about US$45 for a first test, results in about 15 minutes.
Set up your Full Test →